Ralph Porter

© 2003

AUTHOR AND DATE

    No serious discussion challenges the Pauline authorship of Galatians.

         Paul is repeatedly mentioned as author by diverse external sources including Clement

              of Rome, Polycarp, Marcion, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian.

         The internal evidence also confirms that Paul wrote the letter.

    The serious discussion concerning the writing of Galatians relates to its date.

    The debate revolves around whether "Galatia" refers to the northern geographical

         region, which Paul did not visit until the second missionary journey, or the political

         province which extends to the south including the churches Paul visited on the first

         journey with Barnabas.

              Those who hold the south Galatian view normally place the date before the

                   Jerusalem Council of Acts 15, assuming Paul would have used that decision in his

                   argument had it been earlier.

                        They place the date at A.D. 48-49.

              The proponents of the north Galatian view place the letter after the council, in

                   about A.D. 55.

              One main reason for the later date is the problem of fitting fourteen years after

                   Paul's conversion into the time before the famine visit in A.D. 46.

              It is also argued that the book parallels the general pattern of Romans and

                   Galatians.

              The later date fits chronology better, while the south Galatian view seems to fit

                   the description of events better.

            There is nothing in the south Galatian view itself that denies a later date, if the

                letter was written after the Jerusalem Council.

              It seems preferable to refer 2:1-10 to the Jerusalem Council and date Galatians

                   about A.D. 55 (= late date).

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

    After Paul founded the church in Galatia, he continued on his trip.

    As usual, the Judaizers followed Paul and made definite inroads into the churches of

         Galatia.

              The controversy centered on obedience to the Mosaic Law.

    Three kinds of Judaizers developed:

         1.    WHO can be saved? 

                    For the original Judaizers, salvation was only for the Jews!

                   Answer: Acts 10-11

                        Salvation is for all who trust Christ, whether Jew or Gentile.

         2.    HOW can a Gentile be saved?

                         The Judaizers eventually accepted Peter's testimony that Gentiles could be

                             saved, but they had to keep the law to obtain salvation.

                   Answer: Acts 15

                        Neither Jew nor Gentile is saved by keeping the law.

                        All must come by faith.

         3.    HOW should a Gentile LIVE to please God? 

                    The issue is sanctification.

                   Answer: Galatians (also Colossians, Philippians, and other books)

                        Sanctification, like salvation, comes by faith alone.

PURPOSE AND THEME

    Paul wrote the letter to the Galatians to refute the position of the Judaizers.

    He demonstrates that it's impossible to reconcile salvation by faith with sanctification by

         law.

              The two cannot exist together.

    In Galatians Paul deals with three issues:

         1.    The Judaizers tried to attack his credibility by denying his authority and his

                        message.

                             So, Paul defends his apostleship and his message   1-2

         2.    The Judaizers' message contradicted the gospel.

                        Paul presents the doctrine of sanctification by faith--the message of liberty in

                        Christ.   3-4

         3.    The Judaizers built a religious system around their legalistic doctrine.

                        Paul responds by presenting the lifestyle that a true doctrine of sanctification

                             will produce   5-6

What are the implications of the message of Galatians for Christians living today?

REALLY FREE: Sanctified by Faith in Christ

Ralph Porter

Ralph Porter

    Are we REALLY FREE?

        Has your relationship with Christ made you feel free?

        Have you been able to enjoy your freedom in Christ?

        Or, do you feel guilty when you exercise your freedom?

    In Galatians, Paul is dealing with a church that started out down the road of faith.

    Now, they want to try to live so as to please God by a rule book.

    Paul's message is that it is impossible to reconcile salvation by faith with sanctification by law.

    His answer is the message of OUR FREEDOM IN CHRIST. We aren't under lawANY LAW!

    Our relationship with God is based on the work Christ did on the cross.

    Why do we feel so guilty?

    Why are we struggling with our past, and the lack of peace and contentment?

    You started out by faith. You had to stop trying to do it yourself, and rest in Him.

    Now walk that way. STOP trying to do it yourself!   Col. 2:6-7

    You have what you have because you are "in Christ"

    That's the basis of true FREEDOM!

AUTHOR AND DATE

    No serious discussion challenges the Pauline authorship of Galatians.

        He is mentioned repeatedly by external sources including Clement of Rome, Polycarp,

            Marcion, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian.

        The internal evidence also confirms that Paul wrote the letter.

    The serious discussion concerning Galatians relates to its date.

    The debate revolves around whether "Galatia" refers to the northern geographical region,

        which Paul did not visit until the second missionary journey, or the political province which

        extends to the south including the churches Paul visited on the first journey with Barnabas.

            Those who hold the south Galatian view normally place the date before the Jerusalem

                Council of Acts 15, assuming Paul would have used that decision in his argument had

                it been earlier.

                    They place the date at A.D. 48-49.

            The proponents of the north Galatian view place the letter after the council, in about

                A.D. 55.

                     One main reason for the later date is the problem of fitting fourteen years after

                        Paul's conversion into the time before the famine visit in A.D. 46.

                    It is also argued that the book parallels the general pattern of Romans and

                        Galatians.

            The later date fits chronology better, while the south Galatian view seems to fit the

                description of events better.

            There is nothing in the south Galatian view itself that denies a later date, if the

                letter was written after the Jerusalem Council.

            It seems preferable to refer 2:1-10 to the Jerusalem Council and date Galatians about

                A.D. 55.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

    After Paul founded the church in Galatia, he continued on his trip.

    As usual, the Judaizers followed Paul and made definite inroads into the churches of

         Galatia.

    The controversy centered on obedience to the Mosaic Law.

    Three kinds of Judaizers developed:

         1.    WHO can be saved?

                   For the original Judaizers, salvation was only for the Jews!

                Answer: Acts 10-11

                   Salvation is for all who trust Christ, whether Jew or Gentile.

         2.    HOW can a Gentile be saved?

                    The Judaizers eventually accepted Peter's testimony that Gentiles could be saved,

                       but they still had to keep the law to obtain salvation.

                Answer: Acts 15

                   Neither Jew nor Gentile is saved by keeping the law.

                   All must come by faith.

         3.    HOW should a Gentile LIVE to please God?

                     The issue is sanctification.

                Answer: Galatians (also Colossians, Philippians, and other books)

                   Sanctification, like salvation, comes by faith alone.

    The Judaizers had advanced beyond the old position of the Pharisees in that they no longer

        insisted that salvation was only for Israel.

    Neither did they maintain the necessity of obedience to the law and the traditions to be

        saved.

            Peter had answered the former position in the events of Acts 10-11.

            The latter position was answered by the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15.

    These Judaizers that plagued Paul had developed a new form of legalism.

    Their doctrine accepted salvation by faith for Jews and for Gentiles without distinction.

        However, they had added the concept of sanctification by law.

        To be spiritual, the child of God had to live by the law.

PURPOSE AND THEME

    Purpose: Paul wrote the letter to the Galatians to refute the position of the Judaizers.

    Theme:  Paul demonstrates that it's impossible to reconcile salvation by faith with

                     sanctification by law.

                             The two cannot exist together.

    In Galatians Paul deals with three issues:

         1.    The Judaizers tried to attack Paul's credibility by denying his authority and his

                       message.

                           So, Paul defends his apostleship and his message   1-2

         2.    The Judaizers' message contradicted the gospel.

                       Paul presents the doctrine of sanctification by faiththe message of liberty in

                           Christ.   3-4

         3.    The Judaizers built a religious system around their legalistic doctrine.

                      Paul responds by presenting the lifestyle that a true doctrine of sanctification

                            will produce   5-6

ORGANIZATION

    Galatians divides naturally into three parts:

         1.    Paul defends his authority and his message   1-2

         2.    He demonstrates theologically why sanctification by law and justification by faith

                   cannot exist together   3-4

         3.    Finally, Paul demonstrates the practical implications of true sanctification, that

                   which comes by faith, in our lives   5-6

GREETING   1:1-5

    The polemic nature of the book is revealed in the initial greeting.

    Paul departs from the normal pattern of praise to show the source of his apostleship.

    He puts himself on the same level as those the church recognizes as authoritative.

    His apostleship does not come from men but from God.

    The entire greeting reflects the spirit of the argument.

SURPRISE AT THEIR DEPARTURE   1:6-9

    Paul expresses his surprise that they have so easily been moved away from the gospel

         which he taught them.

    He pronounces an anathema against anyone who would attempt to change the gospel.

         Anyone who would dare to change the gospel message ought to be condemned.

         Even if people on his side of the controversy were to try to change the gospel, they

            deserve to be condemned.

    Paul considers the issue of sanctification an integral part of the gospel message.

SOURCE AND CONFIRMATION OF PAUL'S MESSAGE   1:10-2:21

          The Judaizers seemed especially skilled in the use of the ad hominem attack.

          They recognized the unique character of Paul's position and message.

          They could not attack his message while his position was respected.

          Therefore they began to criticize his authority and calling.

          Paul answers their attack with a defense of himself and his message.

    His content revealed by Christ   1:10-12

         Paul demonstrates that his message is not of human origin.

         The source of his gospel is a revelation of Christ Himself.

         He argues that if he were seeking to please people, he would tell us what people like

              to hear, namely, that we are able to sanctify ourselves.

         However, this message was divinely given and therefore does not flatter human

              abilities.

    His commitment to Judaism   1:13-14

         His former zeal in Judaism demonstrates his sincerity in seeking after God.

         Paul had advanced beyond others of the same age because of his zeal.

         It took supernatural intervention to change his direction.

         He was thoroughly familiar with Judaistic teaching.

         God had to show him the error of the system.

    His conversion and preparation   1:15-17

         After Paul's conversion, he was not taught by men but went away to Arabia to be

              taught by God.

    His communion with the saints   1:18-24

         When he returned, he stayed just fifteen days in Jerusalem for fellowship with Peter.

         Then he began to visit churches and to preach the gospel.

    His confirmation by the apostles   2:1-10

         It was not until 14 years later that he returned to Jerusalem.

         Throughout all this period he did not spend enough time anywhere to receive

              instruction by men.

         Yet when he returned to Jerusalem, his gospel and practices were approved by the

              council.

         Even then they did not instruct him.

         They recognized his apostleship and his ministry to the Gentiles and identified with

              him in that ministry.

    His confrontation with Peter   2:11-14

         Having demonstrated that the church recognized Paul's apostleship, he demonstrates

              the recognition of his authority when he rebuked Peter.

         When he was obligated to reprimand Peter because of the same basic principles he is

              now defending, the acceptance of the rebuke by Peter indicates recognition that

              Paul's authority was equal to or greater than that of Peter.

    His conclusion concerning the problem   2:15-21

         Peter recognized the mistake on his part.

         He had been inconsistent concerning the truth of the gospel and was teaching by his

              example that the Gentiles ought to become Jews.

         Paul argues that the law is for Jews, not Gentiles.

         Justification is not based on the law, but on faith.

         All the law can do is condemn.

         Christ has liberated us from the law by putting us to death.

         If the Judaizers would recognize this truth, as Peter did, and stop attacking the

              bearer of the truth, there would be no further controversy.

         Paul realized that the Judaizers would not accept the message as Peter had accepted

              it, but he hoped to convince the Galatians of the truth.

         Therefore, he concludes the personal defense after demonstrating the church's

              acceptance of his authority and attempts to prove his premise that sanctification

              by law contradicts justification by faith.

    The second major division of the letter is a discussion of the theological basis for

         justification and sanctification by faith.

    Paul uses the experience of the Galatians, combined with truth from the Old Testament,

         as the basis for his argument.

PROOF FROM THEIR RECEPTION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT   3:1-5

    Paul first refers to our own experience when we received the Spirit.

    Paul assumes we will realize that we have received the Spirit by faith.

    Justification is not the issue.

    Having begun our Christian experience by faith, how can we expect to grow to

         perfection by works?

PROOF FROM THE BLESSING OF ABRAHAM   3:6-9

    He supports his premise from the Old Testament.

    The Judaizers claim that the Old Testament supports their view.

    Paul demonstrates that his view is confirmed by the authority they claim to accept.

    Even Abraham was justified by faith.

    God revealed to Abraham that Gentiles would be blessed in him by faith, not by

         obedience to the law.

PROOF FROM THE REDEMPTION (BLESSING)   3:10-14

    The argument is then expanded to show that the blessing could not have come by

         obedience to the law.

    All the law can produce is a curse.

    Justification and blessing came by faith.

PROOF FROM THE PROMISE GIVEN TO ABRAHAM   3:15-18

    The blessing God promised to Abraham did not come by the law.

    It came on the basis of the covenant which God gave to Abraham as a unilateral

         promise.

    Even in human affairs, when a covenant is made, no one changes the conditions after it

         has been ratified.

    If that principle is true on the human level, how much more is it true when God makes a

         covenant?

    The passing of time could not change the covenant.

    A system of laws given 400 years later could not invalidate a previously ratified

         covenant.

    Yet, if the claim of the Judaizers were true, then the promise must be nullified.

    If the inheritance of blessing is based on law, it cannot be based on God's promise as the

         covenant states.

PROOF FROM THE PURPOSE OF THE LAW   3:19-4:11

         Paul explains how the law relates to the covenant by clarifying the true purpose of

              the law.

         The law was added alongside the promise.

         It was never intended to replace the promise.

    Addition because of sin   3:19-22

         The law was given temporarily to condemn all people and to demonstrate the cause